New Vaccines Invented Will Permanently Alter Human DNA

The New York Times reported in March 2015,“Protection Without a Vaccine.”that references the new lengths of research on the usage of synthetic gene to prevent disease, while altering the human DNA. 


Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study said: 

By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease. The sky’s the limit. The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned. 
I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.

Here’s the main point: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the Gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

Looking at it again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.” Alteration of the human genetic makeup. Permanent alteration.

The Times asked Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion: 

Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.

Vaccines have genes within them that can alter DNA once added into the DNA structure. A lot of propaganda has gone around about vaccines, making them seem harmless and effective. The reality is, we are being injected with synthetic genes that can alter the human race. It would be a great experiment to look into vaccines effects on the human DNA.

Participants would be injected with either genes 1-6 or genes 7-12. They will also undergo exams and tests, in clinics, to examine any biological marker that is triggered by genetic alterations.

Is it making people stronger? Are they showing signs of illness? Any behavioral changes?

Through testing and close watch, information can be gathered. There isn’t any consent as there isn’t any knowledge about whats being done to them. What would be the prime objective in this crazy research? It varies.

 If there was, it would come to two points. One, they could either make us weak, calmer, compliant and reliant on others. Secondly, they could make us healthier and stronger, smart beings. Of course, this research would be conducted by the military and results would be disclosed to private parties. It is easy for the Pentagon and DARPA, to hold onto secrets, as their goal is to create tough soldiers.


This huge experiment wouldn’t give any anxiety to the medical cartel. Believe it or not, the US medical industry is already responsible for the deaths of 2.5 million people a decade, from FDA approved drugs and medical negligence in hospitals. Many government officials and the media who had knowledge of this fact, have done absolutely nothing to address it.

Lee Silver, a molecular biologist from Princeton University, author of Remaking Eden, quotes that:  

The GenRich–who account for ten percent of the American population–[will] all carry synthetic genes. All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class…

Naturals [unaltered humans] work as low-paid service providers or as laborers. [Eventually] the GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed, and with as much romantic interest in each other as a current human would have for a chimpanzee.

Many think that it is inherently unfair for some people to have access to technologies that can provide advantages while others, less well-off, are forced to depend on chance alone, [but] American society adheres to the principle that personal liberty and personal fortune are the primary determinants of what individuals are allowed and able to do.

Indeed, in a society that values individual freedom above all else, it is hard to find any legitimate basis for restricting the use of repro[grammed]-genetics. I will argue [that] the use of reprogenetic technologies is inevitable. [W]hether we like it or not, the global marketplace will reign supreme. 

Gregory Stock, former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at the UCLA School of Medicine says: “Even if half the world’s species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous diversity would still remain.

When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new forms—some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two—burst onto the scene.

We best serve ourselves, as well as future generations, by focusing on the short-term consequences of our actions rather than our vague notions about the needs of the distant future.”

 These two scientist are talking about ethics, while many “experts” have their twisted ways of thinking whats wrong or right. Now that it is becoming a reality that we have vaccines that alter our genetic makeup, we are going into the Brave New World. In genetics, a lot of discoveries have made us closer to a stimuli-response world, and it would take our freedom away.
Our geneticists, universities, brain researchers, corporations, and the government is behind these decisions to pass around synthetic genes. The defense for freedom is becoming increasingly important for us all.

Right now, the government controls the philosophy for vaccines. They will stop at nothing to make sure we all are mandated to be vaccinated.